摘 要

Abstract II

绪 论 1

1 无权处分及无权处分合同的界定 2

1.1 无权处分的内涵界定 2

1.1.1 物权形式主义下无权处分内涵 2

1.1.2 债权意思主义下无权处分内涵 2

1.1.3 债权形式主义下无权处分内涵 2

1.1.4 我国关于无权处分的内涵及认定条件 3

1.2 无权处分合同的内涵界定 3

2 无权处分合同的法律效力 5

2.1 不同物权行为模式下无权处分合同的效力问题 5

2.1.1 债权意思主义模式下以法国为例 5

2.1.2 物权形式主义模式下以德国为例 5

2.1.3 债权形式主义模式下以奥地利为例 6

2.1.4 国际性法律文件中关于无权处分合同效力问题的规定 6

2.2 我国无权处分合同效力问题研究 6

2.2.1 无权处分效力问题的法律规定 6

2.2.2 《合同法》第51条之规定 7

2.2.3 《买卖合同司法解释》之规定 7

2.3 学界关于无权处分合同效力问题的各种学说 8

2.3.1 无效说 8

2.3.2 效力待定说 8

2.3.3 有效说 9

3 笔者关于无权处分合同效力问题的看法 10

3.1 对无效说看法 10

3.2 效力待定说看法 10

3.3 对有效说看法 11

4 完善我国无权处分合同效力认定体系的建议 14

结 论 15

参 考 文 献 16

致 谢 17

摘 要

无权处分合同的效力问题一直在民法学领域存在较大的争议，是一个经久不衰，值得探讨的点。《中华人民共和国合同法》第51条规定:“无权处分的人处分他人财产，经权利人追认或者无权处分的人订立合同后取得处分权的，该合同有效。”《合同法》在正式立法时对于无权处分合同效力问题的表述过于笼统，引起了诸多学者的讨论与质疑，笔者亦认为欠妥，且不论该规定中涉及的确认合同有效的情况是否狭隘，该条对于无权处分合同效力待定的规定首先与善意取得制度存在一定程度上的背道而驰。本文将从此条法规切入分四个部分进行研究阐述，通过举例论证，对比论证，分析论证等方式和发现问题，分析问题，解决问题的路径展开论述，意在厘清无权处分合同的效力问题如何认定以及提出相关的立法建议。第一部分将无权处分、无权处分合同的概念在不同的物权变动模式下分别进行界定，以明晰本文的研究对象；第二部分分别研究国外立法、国际性法律文件以及我国立法和我国学界关于无权处分合同的效力问题的认定；第三部分阐述笔者对于我国学界不同观点的看法并提出自己的观点进行相关论证；第四部分在上文论述且支持有效说的基础上提出笔者关于完善我国无权处分合同的效力认定体系之建议。

关键词：无权处分；无权处分合同；善意取得；物权变动模式

Abstract

The right to dispose of in the civil law belongs to a more complex legal concept, which is the biggest controversy than the power of disposition of the contract. Article 51 of the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "the person who has no power to dispose of the property of another person and who has the right to suspend or have no power to dispose of the contract has obtained the right of disposition." The validity of the contract is determined to be effective, too general to consider, caused a lot of scholars to discuss and question, I also think that defective, and whether the provisions involved in the confirmation of the contract is valid, the provisions of the first and The goodwill acquisition system of civil law is contrary. This article will be divided into four parts from this study to elaborate, through examples of demonstration, comparative demonstration and other ways and find the problem, analyze the problem, solve the problem of the path discussed, intended to clarify the effectiveness of the contract without the issue of how to identify and put forward Related to judicial advice. The second part studies the foreign legislation, the international legal documents and the determination of the validity of the legislation and the academic circles in China without the right to dispose of the contract. The second part studies the foreign legislation, the international legal documents and the determination of the validity of the legislation The third part elaborates the author's view on the different viewpoints of our academic circles and puts forward their own opinions. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the system of determining the validity of the contract.

Keywords:unauthorized disposition;unauthorized disposition contract;bona fide acquisition;